Re-roofing a 1960’s Pole Barn
Reader JEFF in GRESHAM writes:
“I have an older (built in the 60’s?) pole building that needs a new roof. It is a typical metal over 2×6 purlins (Purlins 2′ on center, trusses 12′ apart). Current roof is corrugated metal attached with ring shank nails with rubber washers and it leaks (unsurprisingly). The roof had a spray on coating 15 years ago which helps, but again, it leaks and it needs a new roof. I would like to do standing seam roof but since the roof needs to act as a shear diaphragm If I tear off the old metal, I need to sheet the whole thing so those are two substantial projects in their own right (#1 tearing off and then #2 re-sheeting…) . I tried taking a pry bar to find out the difficulty of removing the old nails and it was stuck so securely I ripped the head off the nail rather than nail of the roofing and I estimate there are about 6000 of them! Thinking about it and doing some research, I think it’s possible to go over the existing corrugated roofing with standing seam using wood strips over the corrugated. I’m still concerned about things like condensation occurring if I do that and not sure if it would be unlikely, infrequent, or maybe much worse than what I see now. Obviously frequent and substantial condensation is just going to lead to rot and problems. I’ve looked at the added weight and its about 1.4 lbs per square foot using 24Ga standing seam = pretty trivial compared to snow loads so I think it’s unlikely to be an issue. I’m interested in knowing what advice, experience, and tips the Pole Barn Guru can offer for this situation. Please see attached .pdf for a visual of the scenario at hand. Thanks!?”
Yes, those old nails are tough to remove. Most standing seam steel is not stiff enough to span between purlins, so it is nearly always recommended to install over solid sheathing. Even if it will carry this span, it is likely to droop between purlins and if stepped upon, by accident, between purlins expect it to buckle.
Next challenge – those roof trusses are probably not designed to carry more than bare minimum loads. You want to add as little weight as possible. It might behoove you to have them inspected by a Registered Professional Engineer to insure they will be structurally adequate to handle any added weight.
Assuming trusses are structurally adequate, I would pull out every nail I could and, for ones where heads break off, once old roofing is removed, pound them in. Sheet roof with 19/32″ CDX plywood, install 26 gauge standing seam over a synthetic underlayment. There is no real reason to go to 24 gauge, other than a salesperson’s commission. Make sure to vent ridge and have adequate air intakes and condensation should then be a non-issue.
Your building is designed, as ordered by you, with ceiling loaded trusses, designed for a 10 psf (pounds per square foot) dead load, including ceiling joists 24″ on center. This is reflected in your engineer sealed structural building plans.
DEAR POLE BARN GURU: I plan on putting up a 60′ x 120′ post frame shed. I’m going to run my 6×6 posts at 8′ o.c. can I use all 8′ 2×6 material for the girts or should I have some 16′ material staggered in with the 8′ material? Will that increase the strength or do you think it would be similar? Thanks guru! JASON in NEW HOLSTEIN
DEAR MATTHEW: Having built for myself an elevated floor post frame building (I had 14 feet of grade change in 24 feet), I feel as though they are a great solution. Unless you had enough grade change to practically utilize space below, I would use interior columns to reduce spans of beams and joists – little, short columns being far less expensive than large multiple ply beams and large dimension floor joists. My knees also prefer to live on wood, rather than concrete – making this a double win.
DEAR SHARKBITE: In order to determine if your trusses can handle weight of this unit, you would need to look at your engineer sealed roof truss drawings. If Bottom Chord Dead Load (often shown as BCDL) is less than five (5) psf (pounds per square foot) then probably not. Ideally, reach out to whomever fabricated your trusses. Give them weight of your unit, where you propose to hang it, as well as if you have a ceiling and insulation and they can give you a definitive thumbs up or down.
DEAR CRAIG: You can if you want your building to collapse in a moderate snow event. Along with your trusses, you should have received an engineer sealed truss drawing with all specifics as to what can be carried by it and spacing. If you did not, and they are prefabricated metal connector plated wood trusses, there should be a manufacturer’s stamp somewhere on truss bottom chords. You could then contact them and give them truss specifics (and probably a few photos showing lumber grades, web configuration and steel connector plate sizes. From this, they may be able to determine what you have actually spent your hard earned money on.
The two best things you can do are to seal your concrete floor (

DEAR POLE BARN GURU: Can Hansen build the barn on top of an existing slab? CLYDE in BELLVILLE
DEAR POLE BARN GURU: My trusses are 8 feet on center will the metal ceiling liner span that 8 feet without sagging if I blow in fiberglass insulation? RODNEY in LAKE ELMO
Faced insulation is the absolute wrong product to use for insulating your ceiling. Any insulation placed at the truss bottom chord level should be unfaced. The best bet would be to blow insulation in above the finished ceiling.
Typically pole building trusses are NOT designed (by any provider or contractor) to support a ceiling load. The price to upgrade to ceiling loaded trusses is generally offered as an option on our quotes, and is typically fairly inexpensive. All too often, it is a case of a client trying to shave a few dollars and ends up being a case of “penny wise, pound foolish”. We do make every concerted effort to prevent truss repair issues, such as this client is now confronted with, from occurring.