Dear Pole Barn Guru: Concrete Footing or Not?

DEAR POLE BARN GURU: I have read much debate about setting the poles in concrete with no “footing” beneath them vs. setting the poles on a concrete footing and back filling with gravel and earth. Seems to be an issue of rot.  What do you recommend? MYSTIFIED IN MAGNOIA

DEAR MYSTIFIED: It seems you and I have been reading the very same posts on advice boards all over the internet!

Let’s start with the “no footing” concept. Typically the soil is not able to resist applied vertical loads when those loads are transferred through the post alone. Therefore, the post is set on some type of a footing, which in the case of post-frame construction is usually concrete.

Footings must be adequate in area (radius squared x pi) to prevent the building from settling under not only the weight of the structure itself, but also the load from snow or minimum live load requirements. They must also be thick enough, to prevent the column from punching through the footing.

Considering even a fairly small span building, with minimum loads requires a footing diameter of 18 inches or more, it is fairly impractical to think of a material other than concrete which could be placed affordably beneath the columns.

On to the “rot” issue. Chapter 23 of the IBC (International Building Code) requires wood in contact with concrete to be either “naturally durable” or pressure-preservative treated. This, in itself, tends to take away credence from the “concrete rots treated wood” faction.

I know every major post frame building company in America. I have yet to have any of them report of having a single “properly treated post” rot off.

The clincher in this is “properly treated post”.

When the first IBC was published in 2000, Section 1805.7.1.2 stated, “Wood poles shall be treated in accordance with AWPA C2 or C4. This language remained the same in the 2003 IBC. The AWPA C2 and C4 standards have been withdrawn, therefore are no longer applicable or referenced standards in later editions of the Code.

In the 2006 IBC, however, things changed. Section 1807.7.1 states, “Wood poles shall be treated in accordance with AWPA U1 for sawn timber posts (Commodity Specification A, Use Category 4B)”. In the 2009 IBC (and repeated for the 2012 edition), the language remained the same, however the referenced section of the Code is now 1807.3.

What this means to you or the average consumer who is shopping for a new pole barn? Everything!

Take a visit to the local lumberyard or big box lumber store. Take a walk through the pressure treated lumber department. Every piece of pressure preservative treated lumber has a tag on it. This tag identified who the pressure treater was, as well as the level of pressure treating. Sadly, most of the pressure treated posts will be treated only to UC-4A…which does NOT meet with the Code requirements for use in pole buildings!

What this means is there are a plethora of buildings which have under treated columns, which is responsible for the rot issues, not the proximity to concrete.

Every time I have someone try to foist the “concrete rots treated wood” story on me, I ask them to show me a single laboratory test, which proves their point. None exist.

The best solution – and my recommendation – use a properly treated post, backfilled with pre-mix concrete in a monolithic pour. Place a minimum of six (and better eight) inches of concrete below the column and eight or more inches up the post (this is known as a bottom collar).

35 thoughts on “Dear Pole Barn Guru: Concrete Footing or Not?

  1. Has there been enough history with non CCA treated posts to know if they will last in concrete or dirt? Why not just use a concrete footing and post base since the buried post contributes very little to the stiffness of the building?
    Great website! Thanks!

    1. In most cases, the chemicals which are used for preservatives are the same as or similar to CCA, just without the arsenate. Most of the compounds have been used for treating for a number of years and have been rigorously tested. The buried column actually provides for the moment (bending) resistance is an embedded system. We’re currently aware of only one bracket which is capable of withstanding those rotation forces, and it is not an inexpensive part.

      1. In combination with proper attachment to a concrete slab on grade, embedded columns also reduce the amount of wind shear forces roof and endwall have to carry by 25%.

  2. When you pour the poles in monolithically is the shrinkage of the footing below the pole something to worried about? The 1/16″ gap would eliminate end bearing until the load increased to shear the friction from the pole to the encasing concrete.

    Also when pouring the poles in are the blocked up off the bottom to be able to pour monolithic?

  3. I am planning on installing a heated therapy pool at our home and want to enclose it for full year use. We live in central PA and code requires a substantial frost depth footing. I am trying to find the least expensive and yet durable way to enclose the pool. I will need to insulate the building and plan to have scissors trusses to allow me to ventilate the structure more easily.

    If I use a pole structure, I am not sure how to ensure the inside floor will not heave with freezes and thaws. I was planning to use a poured concrete floor

    My other option is to install a regular foundation and build up from there. Obviously that will increase costs substantially–6 to 10 thousand dollars I suspect.

    what would you suggest for the best long term option. Thanks.

    Any thoughts on this

  4. bobby wayne carlisle


    1. The scenario you describe is probably inadequate to prevent uplift. You should confer with the RDP (Registered Design Professional – engineer or architect) who designed your building’s plans to verify adequacy.



    1. Yes, it should be placed on an adequate concrete footing pad. A provision for uplift also needs to be accounted for. These are items which will be spelled out on the RDP (Registered Design Professional – engineer or architect) sealed plans for your building.

  6. Saratoga wyoming Customer is wanting to build a Morton pole barn house wondering about no footings slab on grade with hydronic heat very expensive would hate to see something happen to tubing for heating

    1. admin Post author

      Post frame buildings do not require a continuous footing and foundation. Columns do need to extend below the frost line and be adequately concreted in. Most important will be adequately preparing your site to avoid frost heave issues. Search on our website for “frost” and “site prep” for more information.

  7. Hello and thank you for this site.

    Concerning posts for a pole barn would .40cca treated be good vs. the stuff at home depot?

  8. Hi, thank you for all the information, here is my question. Is there anything wrong with the following idea except for the concrete “waste”.

    In either a home or shop pole barn build
    Phase 1) at each of the column locations, pour the appropriately sized pier down to below frost line, with square tops that are at the level of the slab (when it would be finished). leave rebar sticking out the sides where the slab will be poured.

    Phase 2) Pour the slab

    Phase 3) Mount brackets onto pier locations, attach the columns/posts to brackets

    Keeping in mind that the specifics would be done by an engineer, but mostly i’m thinking about the concept. It seems like Metal buildings are built this way, at least the ones I have seen in WNY. The main reason I would be inclined to do this is so that I could do it in phases that may be months apart from each other, as well as having a nice solid slab for other needs as well as to work off of. Thank you

    1. By doing proper insulation techniques around the piers, you can actually avoid having to dig down to frost depth and reduce your needed amount of concrete. Wet set brackets should be poured into the piers at this point, with the “flat” of the bracket 4-1/2″ above the top of the pier.

      In Step #1, when your pour your slab, top of slab should be 1″ below the flat of the wet set brackets.

      Many people prefer to wait on pouring their slab – anything dropped onto a new slab has the potential to chip it, especially steel tools (like hammers). By waiting to pour the slab until the building shell is completed, you can pour out of the elements.

    1. You will need to have these calculated by an engineer, as we do not provide PEMBs (bolt up steel buildings).

    1. Concrete footings would be a challenge to place after your building is up. You would pretty well have to support each column, excavate to six to eight inches below the column, pour the concrete pad, then backfill the excavation, being sure to adequately compact the soil as you backfill. Moral of the story – so much easier to do it right the first time.

  9. Question- looking at a modest single story Post Frame metal home. This is clay expansive Texas dirt. The builder is looking at using 5×5 PT post 3’ down (frost line 12”) filling with concrete. Finish building – add a floating slab. Do you see issues with this? Do we need sleeves on the poles?

    1. Successful building on clay does come with its own set of challenges

      5×5 columns are actually not very strong, I would discourage their use unless your builder can provide engineer sealed drawings specific to your building’s dimensions and features with the correct design wind speed and exposure.

      Properly pressure preservative treated columns (UC-4B rated) do not require sleeves.

  10. IIn the summer of 1959 I constructed a 30 by 72 foot equipment shed for my brother-in–law who had a landscaping business. It is a pole building, and apparently some of the posts below ground level have rotted. My memory is that we used a post hole digger to dig the post holes. And then we poured a concrete pad at the bottom of the holes before we set the posts into the holes. Then I think we backfilled the holes by pouring concrete into the post holes up to the level of the surface of the ground.
    Later I think i noticed that the concrete around some of the posts had cracked—presumably because of swelling of the treated posts. Presumably that moisture caused some of those posts to begin to rot over the decades since then.
    Did those treated posts have inadequate treatment? I know there are grades of treatment some of which are adequate for placement below ground level. Perhaps the posts we got for that building were inadequately treated. Shouldn’t adequately treated posts be able to tolerate placement below ground surface? How does one prevent treated posts from swelling and causing the concrete poured in the hole around them to crack?
    Thanks for any reflections you can provide.

    1. Properly pressure preservative treated columns should outlast any of us. To avoid treated columns swelling and cracking encasement – use a bottom collar so top of concrete is roughly two feet below grade. Use higher strength concrete with at least four inches of premix between column edge and earth, or add rebar reinforcement to encasement surrounding column.


    I understand the idea of a monolithic pour being best, but that may be difficult for a variety of reasons…. Instead I was thinking of pouring the 8=10 inch thick footings first, with the “collar” poured second after the poles are placed. I would reinforce the footings with a #4 rebar grid and was thinking of leaving rebar “loops” sticking out of the footing so as to tie the footing and collar together when the collar is poured over the top of the footing. I assume this will allow the footing to assist in providing uplift resistance along with the collar almost as good as a monolithic pour.

    . Any thoughts on this approach? Thanks!

    1. It will probably be just fine (you should have your building’s engineer verify) however it does sound like far more effort.

  12. Just out of curiosity, what is the best way to suspend a 20 ft long pole weighing over 100 lbs 8-10 inches above the floor of an augered hole? Bracing at ground level and in three directions up high?

  13. we are in the process of building a pole barn house. The posts are treated and set into the ground. We have been getting some flack about the fact that we didn’t use concrete pillars. Should I be concerned that the building will only last 40 years? We want to make this our place for our retirement years. Also, it’s an investment to hand down to our children. We are in Montana where I realize there is an issue of frost heaves. Please advice me on the best type of foundation we can use for ultimate structure durability, Currently we are planning on a monolithic slab with in floor radiant heat. Also, is there a way to secure the posts to the slab to gain further strength in case of rot. Thank you

  14. Planning to do a pole barn in Nebraska. Frost line at 42″, digging holes 52″ deep X 16″ diameter with 4″ tamped gravel at bottom. Then setting pole on this and filling around with gravel. Is this adequate to keep from settling or heaving, or should we pour a concrete footing for pole to sit on?

    1. admin Post author

      Unless your building has a very small clearspan, it is doubtful a 16″ diameter hole will provide adequate bearing surface for a poured concrete footing of at least six inches thickness. Ultimately you should rely upon the embedment design provided by the engineer who designed your building’s plans – otherwise you run a serious risk of settling.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Building KitPrice

Know more about our pricing.

Pole Barn Guru Blog

The industry’s most comprehensive post frame blog.

Ask The Guru

This guru will grant you the answer to one pole barn question!

Pole Building Learning Center

To help guide you in the design of your new pole building.

Photo Gallery

Look at our collection of building photos for creative ideas!

Paint Your Building

Lets pick out some colors!