A Tape Measure Idea
The design upon which most modern spring tape measures are built was patented by Alvin J. Fellows in 1868. But even a better mousetrap doesn’t always catch on immediately. In 1922 Hiram Farrand received another patent and within a few years the Farrand Rapid Rule was being mass produced and was slowly adopted by carpenters.
As a provider of pole (post frame) building kit packages one of the biggest challenges faced by mostly the very same carpenters as those Mr. Farrand dealt with is proper use of the tape measure. While the majority of Americans seemingly can hook one end of a tape measure over a point and measure to another point, when it comes to pole building eave heights these abilities appear to be as remote as the South Pole in the dead of winter.
The measure of eave height is indicated no less than at least five times on every set of Hansen Pole Buildings plans, as well as 51 times in the Hansen Pole Buildings Construction Manual, which is provided with the investment into each building kit. Being as the term “eave height” is used so frequently, the errors cannot possibly be due to failure to read and recognize.
(For another good read on the definition of eave height: https://www.hansenpolebuildings.com/blog/2012/03/eave_height/)
Therefore, I have determined (as the “idea” guy), it must be due to faulty tape measures!
Having a “light bulb” moment, I suggested to the Hansen Pole Buildings owners a solution to the problem. The company could have tape measures made with the company logo on them – and ship one to each person as they invest in a new pole building kit.
The clue to successful measuring would be to have the eave height for each building indicated on each tape measure with permanent marker.
Problem solved. (So far the two owners are not quite endorsing my idea however).
Now if I could just figure out the Acme “Hole Kit”

DEAR POLE BARN GURU: I’m writing to you from one of your old states, Idaho. I just bought a 10 acre farm which has a pole barn; dirt floor, no power, etc. I would like it to be taller so I could pull my camper into it but it only has a standard 8’ tall door. I have been thinking that rather then trying to raise the roof, perhaps I could or should dig down a couple of feet and pour a concrete pony wall all around it and then pour my concrete floor. So I guess my question to you Mr. Pole Barn Guru is, which is going to be the better or more economical way to go? Raise the roof or dig the foundation down deeper? Thank you for your time! TRAVIS in NAMPA

DEAR POLE BARN GURU: 
DEAR JIM: Since you are in planning stages, I will throw lots of free advice at you.
Anyone can leave enough benefits (and features) out of a building to get to a best price. With your limited amount of supplied information, someone could easily quote you a galvanized roof only building with eight foot high walls! Certainly far too short to ride in and totally impractical. It would not surprise me to see you get responses for 12 and 14 foot eave buildings, when in reality it takes a 16 foot eave to truly make for a great arena.
In reality, there exists no easy solution for your challenge. In most instances, you will find a column size and grade working nicely with a nine foot ceiling, fails miserably with a 13 foot ceiling height. This will be due to beam forces (your poles act as beams to span from ground to roof) being distance of span squared. Your proposed taller building columns would need to withstand forces nearly double those of your shorter counterpart. This alone negates probability of splicing into posts to make them taller.
DEAR VERONIKA: I personally would like to believe I build very well, however I am not for hire.
DEAR STEVE: I’d be contacting local installers of closed cell spray foam insulation. You will get close to R-7 per inch of foam (again, must be closed cell) and do not have the ventilation issues posed by using batt insulation between purlins. You will need to block off the eave and ridge vents for this to be an effective solution.
Spray foam release agents are a blend of specialized parting agents, specifically designed to prevent polyurethane foam insulation from adhering to most surfaces where the product is applied.
DEAR JESSE: It is always most affordable to build the largest footprint one can, on a single level. It also is most practical in terms of accessibility. Even for those who are not mobility challenged, going up and down stairs gets to be old far before we are!
DEAR BILL: Post frame construction is most certainly the way to go for basketball courts (read more here: