Tag Archives: Kirk Grundahl

2019 NFBA Frame Building Expo Recap

NFBA’s (National Frame Building Association) Frame Building Expo is an annual event for post-frame industry builders and suppliers. It provides educational sessions, a trade show and an ability to interact with fellow members of our community. Below is an article I have submitted to F+W Media (www.fwmedia.com) publishers of Rural Builder and Frame Building News magazines for inclusion in an upcoming publication. For non-industry members (or those of you who missed this year’s Expo) I will share below:

Some things have changed and others have remained pretty much without change since my very first NFBA Annual Conference in Hershey, PA in 1987. Some once familiar faces are no longer with us and others have changed employers.

At this year’s 2019 Frame Building Expo, builder attendees were predominately from within a 500 mile radius of our host venue – Louisville, KY. While some might say post frame industry’s heart lies here, I can attest to there being thousands upon thousands of post-frame builders from outside this area who were not Expo participants, for whatever reason.

A solution to this may be to reach out to these builders as well as engineers, architects and vendors who have not attended an Expo for say five years. I am talking serious discounts – just enough to cover hard costs of them attending.

Stepping now onto my soap box. Let’s start showing our world what post frame can actually do. In my humble opinion, we should have a booth at this year’s National International Builders’ Show. If they have breakouts sessions, let’s offer to do one on post-frame homes. I’d donate my time to man the booth (provided I can get some time to interact with other vendors) and/or be a presenter, just cover my expenses – cheaper than an employee or contractor. And I actually have some sort of idea as to what I am talking about…..building our industry. Every convert to post-frame buildings brings us a step closer to mainstream. Off my soap box, thank you for your patience.

I will imagine attendance will be reported as greatest ever, however my informal visual tells me otherwise as breakout sessions I attended had a plethora of empty seats and there was plenty of walking room between trade show booths. Rarely did I have a significant wait to talk with a vendor and (kudos to them) they universally were willing to give everyone I saw their undivided and individual attention. Never once did I feel slighted.

What Was Best

I have to admit I was highly flattered when a gentleman Building Designer from an Eastern state asked if he could have his photo taken with “The Pole Barn Guru”. Instead we spent probably an hour talking post-frame buildings one-on-one in a hall. My Monday through Friday daily blog appears to have become widely read within our industry as I received numerous positive comments. I really appreciate your affirmations and am open to topics any of you would like discussed.

Courteous and knowledgeable vendors – they rocked it!

Breakout sessions by Kirk Grundahl, “Risk Management & Permanent Bracing of Long Span Trusses” and Aaron Halberg’s, “Vertical Loads on Post-Frame Buildings” were both well-presented and contained good solid information for post-frame builders.

On the trade show floor I was impressed by offerings from some more recent vendors. These would include County Line Concepts (www.countylineconcepts.com) with their RidgeRunner 3:10®. RidgeRunner 3:10® has a 36-inch long HDPE high-density plastic base with four custom-designed hardened spring-loaded steel punches. It allows six metal panels to be accurately punched at one time and has adjustable arms for instant spacing of rows of holes. Their Ridgeline9™ easily marks angles on steel panels for accurate cutting on gable endwalls.

Greiner Building Solutions, Inc. (www.greinerbuildingsolutions.com) has developed contractor friendly systems for column bracing, column marking and builder safety.

Permanent Post Systems (www.permanentpostsystems.com) is promoting their unique patented field height adjustable column base keeping building columns above ground as well as at a fixed height.

Numerous unscheduled discussions amongst show participants in regards to post-frame building collapses due to Upper Midwest snows as well as talk on how our post-frame industry is heading more and more into residential home markets.

What Was a Challenge

Breakout Sessions beginning at 7:30 am Wednesday and 7:00 am Thursday.  Just maybe a little too much content has been squeezed into too little time?

Breakout Sessions put on by those outside post-frame industry. They just are not as relevant as industry specific presentations.

Proliferation of trade show floor vendors who provide steel coil or roll forming equipment. While I am certain your investment into booth space is appreciated, I am unsure if beyond a small minority of Expo attendees are your client base.

Very few vendors who actually follow up on Expo made contacts.

What Was Missing….

A Commercial Post-Frame Building Design class. Professors Dr. Frank Woeste, P.E. and Dr. Don Bender, P.E. who in the 1990’s taught these on Monday and Tuesday pre-Expo.  Personally I found these classes to be a great resource and inspiration, however there has not been a class since International Building Code adoptions.

Round Tables. As a NFBA Board member from 1990-1993, I assisted in being a moderator at one of approximately 20 tables of 12. Each round table had a moderator and its own subject. Every 20 minutes there was a “musical chairs”, allowing participants to be able to attend as many as six different discussions over two hours. This was always a show highlight giving participants an opportunity to learn from their peers and brainstorm ideas.

Some sort of instruction on building and maintaining websites, blogging, social media, PPC and PPV ads. This might need to be done Tuesday in an all-day program. There could be a nominal charge to cover hard costs and be a “lunch on your own”.

A NFBA division for those who supply post frame building kit packages, as well as Building of the Year Awards to their clients who self-build.

Long time NFBA supporter and usual vendor National Hardware® (www.natman.com) provider of sliding door components.

Potential vendors who I feel should be participants:

The Home Depot® and Lowe’s®

Builders First Source, ABC Supply Company, Allied Building Products, 84 Lumber, U.S. LBM and BMC Stock Holdings.

Sectional garage door manufacturers such as Amarr, Clopay, Overhead and Wayne Dalton.

Alside, Anderson Windows and Jeld-Wen.

Bridger Steel and Union Corrugating.

Simpson Strong-Tie and USP Structural Connectors.

My Grade for 2019’s Expo?

I’d give this year’s Expo a C for being average, not exceptional.  Looking forward to meeting you at next year’s 2020 NFBA Expo in Des Moines, Iowa!

What is a Building Official?

What is a Building Official, and what is their Scope of Work?

The average potential new post frame owner (as well as most building contractors) has little or no idea of what a Building Official’s scope of work truly is. Sean Shields and Kirk Grundahl, P.E. (Professional Engineer) recently published an article in SBC Magazine in regards to this very subject. At the end of this article, I will tell you why this is so important.

I will include here only excerpts from the authors’ summary:

“The following simply summarizes what the model code states, as it is adopted into law:

A building official’s role is to administer and enforce the adopted building code, nothing more and nothing less.

The building official shall examine all aspects of the construction project for compliance with the specific charging language and scope of the section of the code being evaluated.

If anything about the construction project does not conform to the requirements of pertinent laws, the building official shall, if there are any non-conforming issues, reject in writing, stating the reasons therefor.

Implied here is that the written rejection shall provide:

  1. Specific evidence of non-conformance, and
  2. Enough information for the owner of the building to be able to cure the non-conformance based on the evidence provided, and
  3. A clear and easy to understand pathway to cure the deficiency.

Building PermitThe building official is also authorized and directed to enforce the provisions of this code. The building official shall have the authority to render interpretations of this code and to adopt policies and procedures in order to clarify the application of its provisions. Such interpretations, policies and procedures shall comply with the intent and purpose of this code.

Implied here is the fact that not everything needed to enforce the code is going to be written in the code. Hence, interpretations will need to be made with respect to what meets the intent of the code. This is generally and easily undertaken as follows:

  1. A registered design professional (RDP) or approved source provide an accepted engineering analysis or research report and signs and certifies their belief that the issue being dealt with conforms to the code.
  2. A research report is provided by an approved source.
  3. A research report also known as a technical evaluation or accepted engineering analysis is provided by an ANSI ISO/IEC 17065 Accredited Product Certification Body
  1. Obviously, the best-case scenario for building official authorized interpretations is to have them based by an RDP that signs, certifies and seals conformance with the building code provisions. Why?
  • This says that the given RDP takes responsibility for their engineering evaluation scope of work.
  • The work of the RDP is under the authority of a legal entity generally called a Licensing Board and by law has to work in their area of expertise or be subject to fines and loss of their license.
  • The work of the RDP is also generally insured through professional liability insurance.

As a final analogy, a building official is identical to a police officer, where all of us desire that the police officer follow the rule of laws as written. In other words, we would not want a police officer to do the following:

  1. A police officer picks me up for driving under the influence.
  2. My hair was just dyed scarlet and gray because I am an Ohio State fan.
  3. The police officer thinks this is weird and says you must be intoxicated.
  4. The police officer handcuffs me, takes me down to the station, and puts me in jail.

Preferably, the police officer would do a definitive science-based test to ensure I was indeed intoxicated before putting me in jail.

Thankfully, all professional building officials we know base their decisions:

  1. On following the rule of law, and
  2. Using accepted engineering as the basis of interpretations when needed, and
  3. Provide evidence of non-conformances to the law, and
  4. When non-conformances exist, provide an easy to understand pathway to cure it.”

I told you I would tell you why this is important – because a building official cannot merely say something is wrong. He or she is required to put any non-conforming issue in writing and why. And, most importantly, provide an easy to understand method to solve the issue.